Find Your Contribution
Choose a practical contribution pathway in technical research, governance, design, education or moral reflection, with a bounded first output and a way to test usefulness.
Stress-test a character rule: Build a small set of cases where an AI adviser is pressured to hide uncertainty.
A documented case set, baseline and limitations.
Can a second evaluator reproduce the scoring?
Reproduce one model: Rebuild the headroom arithmetic and test a specific boundary or normalization choice.
A reproducible notebook with explicit assumptions.
Does someone else get the same numbers from the same inputs?
Review an AI decision and appeal process: Map one public AI decision from recommendation to appeal and remedy.
A sourced pathway and one proposed oversight or appeal mechanism.
Can an affected person or practitioner identify a missing step?
Test a revisability mechanism: Compare two sunset or oversight designs for one clearly defined deployment.
A mechanism brief with incentives and failure cases.
Does the mechanism still work if a key actor resists it?
Explain a difficult distinction: Help one audience distinguish survival, conditional value and a flourishing event.
A short guide and comprehension notes from three readers.
Can readers explain the distinction in their own words?
Run a research discussion workshop: Design a session that makes assumptions, objections and cruxes visible.
A facilitation guide, pilot and participant feedback.
Can people state the strongest opposing view after the session?
Test a research-source interface: Redesign one source-to-claim interface with nontechnical readers.
An accessible prototype tested on a real research task.
Can users find the original source and its main limitation?
Localize an original explainer: Create a Spanish companion for one concept, with bilingual subject review.
An original guide, terminology notes and reviewer corrections.
Does a bilingual reviewer find meaning changes or false certainty?
Compare two digital-welfare positions: Compare two positions on one precaution under uncertainty about experience.
A fair comparison with a decision-relevant uncertainty.
Would either side recognize its position in your account?
Audit a resource directory: Audit one directory for stale links, unclear eligibility and missing source dates.
A corrected inventory and a documented maintenance process.
Can another maintainer repeat the audit without asking you?
- Stress-test a character rule — Concrete Projects in AGI Preparedness
- Reproduce one model — Introducing Better Futures
- Review an AI decision and appeal process — Preparing for the Intelligence Explosion
- Test a revisability mechanism — Viatopia
- Explain a difficult distinction — Introducing Better Futures
- Run a research discussion workshop — Viatopia
- Test a research-source interface — Concrete Projects in AGI Preparedness
- Localize an original explainer — Preparing for the Intelligence Explosion
- Compare two digital-welfare positions — Preparing for the Intelligence Explosion
- Audit a resource directory — Concrete Projects in AGI Preparedness
Interactive tools load with JavaScript. Original sources retain their language and attribution.